| Relevance/rationale of the indicator (resp. why the indicator was chosen to measure the target and how it is suitable for these purposes) |
Competitiveness, social cohesion, interpersonal communication, research activity and self-education are based on regular access to the Internet by broad groups of the population.
The possibilities of today's society, whether in terms of labor market supply, consumption, free time, or involvement in social life, are largely conditioned by quality and timely information. |
| Target value of the indicator and its evaluation |
|
| Definition |
The indicator expresses the share of households connected to the Internet. |
| Measuring unit |
% |
| Indicator disaggregation |
By household
By size of the municipality where households live
By household income
By region
By sex
By age
By specific population group
By users who use the Internet on a mobile phone (by gender, age, specific population group) |
| Reference period (resp. the period to which the indicator relates) |
Year |
| Related geographical area |
CZ (NUTS 0), region (NUTS 3) |
| Comment |
Data for regions are calculated as three-year rolling averages in order to ensure higher reliability and eliminate significant inter-annual fluctuations in values for data in the regional classification, where in some regions there is a low number of observations, the data in this regional breakdown are presented as three-year rolling averages (i.e. e.g. .the value for 2018 is calculated as an average of the values of 2017, 2018, 2019). |
