| Relevance/rationale of the indicator (resp. why the indicator was chosen to measure the target and how it is suitable for these purposes) |
The existence of the methodology is a prerequisite for the mutual coordination of spatial and strategic planning. |
| Target value of the indicator and its evaluation |
|
| Definition |
The indicator monitors whether there is an up-to-date methodology (or methodologies) determining the ways of mutual coordination between spatial planning and strategic planning documents at the state, regional and municipal levels. |
| Measuring unit |
Number of methodologies |
| Indicator disaggregation |
By state level, regional level and municipal level |
| Reference period (resp. the period to which the indicator relates) |
31. 12. |
| Related geographical area |
CZ (NUTS 0), regions (NUTS 3), municipality with authorized municipal office (LAU 2) |
| Comment |
State level: methodology does not exist.
District level: there is a "Methodology for Strategic Management and Planning of Districts ČR", which in a few pages explicitly talks about the coordination procedures that district can use.
Municipal level: methodology does not exist. |
