Relevance/rationale of the indicator (resp. why the indicator was chosen to measure the target and how it is suitable for these purposes) |
Adequate and effective financing is essential to achieve SDG 5 and the gender related targets across the SDG framework. By tracking and making public gender equality allocations, governments promote greater transparency in and hence this could result in better accountability. |
Target value of the indicator and its evaluation |
Fulfillment of Criterion 1, 2 and 3 |
Definition |
To fulfill Criterion 1 (public expenditures for gender equality and its resource allocations) it is necessary to answer yes to 2 questions out of 3, to fulfill Criterion 2 (extent of promotion gender-related goals in Public Financial Management system) it is necessary to answer yes to 4 questions out of 7 and to fulfill Criterion 3 (public disclosure of allocations for gender equality) it is necessary to answer yes to 2 questions out of 3. |
Measuring unit |
Fully meets requirements (case A=2) / Approaches requirements (case B–G=1) / Does not meet requirements (case H=0); 0 = Not satisfy, 1 = Satisfy; For questions: 0 = NO, 1 = YES |
Indicator disaggregation |
By criterion 1, 2 and 3 |
Reference period (resp. the period to which the indicator relates) |
Year |
Related geographical area |
CZ (NUTS 0) |
Comment |
Classification used:
Case A - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 1/1/1 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case B - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 1/0/0 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case C - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 0/1/0 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case D - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 0/0/1 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case E - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 1/1/0 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case F - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 1/0/1 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case G - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 0/1/1 (0 = NO, 1 = YES)
Case H - fulfilling the criteria 1, 2 and 3 = 0/0/0 (0 = NO, 1 = YES) |