Relevance/rationale of the indicator (resp. why the indicator was chosen to measure the target and how it is suitable for these purposes) |
The rationale for this indicator is to ascertain whether firms are solicited for gifts or informal payments (i.e. bribes) when undertaking transactions that involve public officials. Applying for regulatory licenses, obtaining utility connections, and paying taxes are required of formal forms in most countries and hence the rational for this indicator is to measure the incidence of corruption during these routine transactions. The key strength of the Enterprise Survey is that most of the questions in the survey pertain to the actual, day-to-day experiences of the firm; these questions regarding corruption are not opinion-based question but rather are grounded in the firm’s day-to-day reality. |
Target value of the indicator and its evaluation |
|
Definition |
Number of criminal offenses of providing bribes by legal entities per year. |
Measuring unit |
Number of criminal offenses |
Indicator disaggregation |
|
Reference period (resp. the period to which the indicator relates) |
Year |
Related geographical area |
CZ (NUTS 0) |
Comment |
Data for indicator 16.5.2 are not available according to the relevant UN methodology. Therefore, a proxy indicator was designed, which can be used as a substitute for reporting indicator 16.5.2.
Act No. 418/2011 Coll. on criminal liability of legal entities and proceedings against them, effective from 1 January 2012, statistically monitored from 1 January 2013
TSC 821, 846, 847; ICCS 07031
The value for 2022 is from 1.1.–31.7. |