| Relevance/rationale of the indicator (resp. why the indicator was chosen to measure the target and how it is suitable for these purposes) |
This indicator would allow insight into whether or not countries are strengthening their efforts into safeguarding their cultural and natural heritage. It will help to identify areas that require more attention for policy purposes. |
| Target value of the indicator and its evaluation |
|
| Definition |
Total funding from government (central, regional, local), private sources (household, corporate & sponsorship and international sources) in the preservation, protection and conservation of cultural and/or natural heritage for a given year per capita. The results should be express in Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) in constant $. |
| Measuring unit |
Constant PPP$ 2017, thousand CZK |
| Indicator disaggregation |
By source of funding (public, private)
By type of heritage (cultural, natural)
By level of administration (national, regional/municipal, other) |
| Reference period (resp. the period to which the indicator relates) |
Year (by 31 December) |
| Related geographical area |
CZ (NUTS 0) |
| Comment |
Data compilation based on UIS questionnaire.
All data relate only to cultural heritage.
In absolute terms, these are not expenditures per capita, but total expenditures. |
